This websites uses cookies for Google Analytics.

Due to privacy law you cannot use this website without accepting the use of these cookies.

View Privacy Policy

By accepting you give consent to Google Analytics tracking cookies. You can undo this consent by clearing the cookies in your browser.

Rabobank

A story of curruption that destroys nature

Rabobank is a fortune 500 investment bank headquartered in the city Utrecht, the Netherlands. The bank is known as ‘farmers bank’ and is dedicated to GMO.

The bank has the slogan “Growing a better world together” and presents itself as an environmentally friendly bank. In 2017 the bank won the prestigious “Green Bond Award” as being the most environmentally friendly bank in the world.

Most environmentally friendly bank in the world?

GreenPeace Netherlands and Extinction Rebellion Netherlands have teamed up for the campaign #StopRabo and are filing a claim of € 13 billion euro, for destruction of nature in 🇳🇱 Netherlands and 🇧🇷 Brazil.

#StopRabo campaign

Rabobank likes to promote itself as an environmentally friendly bank through sponsorships of sports and culture, but the bank is actually far from environmentally friendly. Rabobank finances industrial agriculture, deforestation, nature destruction and animal suffering and makes a lot of money from it. Together we demand that Rabobank pays for the damage that the bank has caused. (2023) Why Rabobank makes you pay for the damage that the bank itself has caused Video: YouTube

Involvement in a toxic waste dumping scandal

Rabobank is the top financing partner of $230 billion USD 🛢 Dutch-English oil company Trafigura BV that caused one of the most profound toxic waste dumping scandals in recent history.

Banned in the United KingdomA video report about the toxic waste dumping scandal in 🇨🇮 Ivory Coast, Africa by $230 billion USD 🛢 oil company Trafigura.[ Watch video ]poison dump trafigura

The CEO of Trafigura BV ordered to dump a tanker full of deadly toxic waste into the ocean.

CEO of Trafigura BV: ‘Beyond Dover, and certainly not in the Baltic Sea, because this is a special area. The discharge may not take place until Dover has passed, on the way to Lomé (Nigeria)‘.

Instead of the ocean, the toxic waste was dumped in 🇨🇮 Ivory Coast, Africa, which caused the death of fifteen people and more than 100,000 people to become severely ill, of which 26,000 people were acutely hospitalized following the dumping.

As the top financing partner, Rabobank is partially responsible for the environmental crime. The following is written on the website trafigura.com.

Rabobank, one of Trafigura’s top lenders, seeks to play a significant role in ensuring food security (GMO).

Trafigura.com: our financing partner Rabobank Source: Trafigura.com

amsterdam port servicesThe founder of GMODebate.org had reported about involvement of Amsterdam officials in the toxic waste dumping scandal by Trafigura BV.

Amsterdam officials were involved in the illegal transhipment of the heavily poisoned toxic waste by Trafigura BV and in the departure of the tanker Probo Koala from the port of Amsterdam. The company Amsterdam Port Services (APS) has previously been the target of criminal investigations for involvement in toxic waste offences.

Rabobank's attack on the founder of GMODebate.org

Rabobank is headquartered in Utrecht, the Netherlands, the same city as where the founder of GMODebate.org lived, and would destroy both his business and home through business sabotage and an attack on his home.

Around 2015, Rabobank invested into his business with the clear intent to sabotage it. That sabotage destroyed a high potential technology startup business. The sabotage ended in late 2018/2019 and chronologically preceded an attack on his home in 2019.

[Show details of business sabotage]


Corporate sabotage by Rabobank

It is evident that the Rabobank attempted to sabotage founder's business. Without providing a reason, the Rabobank investor closed a 6 months old startup company and gave up their € 45,000 Euro investment. There was simply no logical reason to give up their investment. They closed the startup company after 6 months, the originally planned time for R&D, in which founder's company had delivered an exceptional result, in time.

The project ŵš.com could have been worth a billion USD. It was seriously watched by over 100.000 people. (cutting edge innovation)

The technology promised to provide true instant website speed for mobile and desktop with navigation speeds as fast as less than 1 millisecond (0,001 second), faster than the refresh rate of many gaming displays. On top of that, the technology could provide +90% of real HTML data-transfer saving and it would provide in new features for the internet, such as ‘real-time HTML’.

real time html

Many top engineers would say that what the technology promised to deliver was impossible.

In 2016, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) would provide a technology named Polaris that promised 34% speed improvement for the internet.

(2016) MIT has a way to speed up web browsing by 34 percent Massachusetts Institute of Technology has developed a technology named Polaris that could make mobile and desktop web browsing about 34 percent faster. Source: Engadget

In 2016, the ŵš.com technology would provide a real +1000% speed improvement for mobile and desktop, reliably, for existing websites such as WordPress, and plug & play (5 minute install).

The ŵš.com technology worked far better than expected and technically the project was a big success.

Instead of being happy, the Rabobank investor illogically walked away and gave up their € 45,000 Euro investment, without providing a reason.

There was simply no logical reason to give up their investment.

Shortly after Rabobank walked away without providing a reason, a business partner from Hollywood, USA joined the project who invested a sum on behalf of an investment banker in Massachusetts, USA.

Utrecht is known as the film city of the Netherlands, similar to Hollywood, and since Rabobank is an investment bank, it is suspicious that the investment came from an investment banker since they not normally invest in technology startups.

In the beginning of the business relation with the business partner from Hollywood, in internal communication with the business partner it was established that the founder perceived Rabobank to have been the culprit and he was then seriously warned that taking on against a fortune 500 company such as the Rabobank would not be wise, by which he received the impression that they might be involved with Rabobank as well.

It is only logical that with the exposing of the business partner as a saboteur (who invested a sum on behalf of an investment banker in Massachusetts, USA) that the logical (unspoken) conclusion would be in 2018/2019 that Rabobank was behind that malicious business practices as well. They played a 'billionaire' joke on a project to waste time on purpose, then walked away again (leaving their investment behind) 'for no reason'.

“Billionaire joke” to waste time on purpose

The business partner from Hollywood took on a role as CEO and agreed to be responsible for the business model. He spent two years to travel around the USA to meet with billionaires while he demanded me and a business partner from London to wait and ultimately delivered no results and simply walked away as if he never cared about the project.

The email address of his film equipment company website was set to ‘info@billionairesclub.com’.

In one of his last emails he shared a link on Forbes.com with the headline that 9 out of 10 startups fail and sought excuse with Rembrandt van Gogh who ‘died poor’ only to become famous later, and inventor Tesla who had a similar fate.

In one of his last emails to him, the founder communicated the following:

Dear [BUSINESS PARTNER],

I understand that you are now trying to walk away, leaving behind your investment, while having no argument against me or the technology. You try to make it look as a generous action from your side, but it’s not righteous.

A few months ago you held on firmly to your CEO position when asked friendly, while considering that your functioning as CEO had increasingly become questioned for lack of results and broken promises, if you wanted to leave. Months of waiting followed. New promises were unmet again. Due to little to no communication from your side it has been perceived as “waiting for no reason”.

In essence, a full year of time has been wasted for no apparent reason and there has been no indication that it matters to you.

It is simply not righteous to now walk away as if a 9 out of 10 startup failed


Slack conversation Slack conversation E-mail conversation E-mail conversation


As can be seen, the founder maintained a respectful attitude towards the business partner and there was no conflict other than a dispute about his performance.

In the beginning of the business relation, in internal communication with the business partner it was established that the founder perceived Rabobank to have been the culprit and he was then seriously warned that taking on against a fortune 500 company such as the Rabobank would not be wise, by which he received the impression that they might be involved with Rabobank as well.

It is only logical that with the exposing of the business partner as a saboteur (who invested a sum on behalf of an investment banker in Massachusetts, USA) that the logical (unspoken) conclusion would be in 2018/2019 that investment bank Rabobank was behind that malicious business practices as well. They played a 'billionaire' joke on a project to waste time on purpose, then walked away again (leaving their investment behind) 'for no reason'.

Considering Rabobank's business relation with founder and its headquarter in the same city as founder, it is only logical that Rabobank has had a role in the attack on founder's home.


The attack on his home destroyed his personal belongings (at least € 30,000 euro damage) and caused health damage that impacted his sport performance.

Paranormal assisted investigation

As can be seen on the website Christchurch Truth, the 2019 New Zealand terrorist attack is called a PsyOp.

(2019) Christchurch Truth The PsyOp that deceived a nation. Source: chchtruth.com (PDF)

After the attack on founder's home in 2019, paranormal influences forced him to investigate the attack and he reported about it through the website .com.

The home of founder was located directly across of the Institute of Parapsychology Netherlands that researches paranormal phenomena.

In 2019, the same year as the attack, the film Third Eye Spies was released that shows that paranormal perception is real.

Film Third Eye Spies, 2019

When founder was 15 years old, he had a paranormal dream that showed +20 years into his future. The dream contained chronological context information for multiple stages of his future that were later one by one confirmed.

Corporate sabotage and attack on home

Rabobank oil drum

Around 2015, Rabobank invested into a pioneering technology business of founder with the clear intent to sabotage it.

Among other things, Rabobank attempted to connect founder with big oil investors whom he was invited to meet at a cafe at the airport Schiphol in Amsterdam.

The invitation to meet with oil investors was strange because oil and internet are not related, and meeting at a cafe at an airport with supposedly 'big' foreign oil investors came across as unusual.

Founder had immetiatly a strong premonition that Rabobank's invitation was related to his reporting about the toxic waste dumping scandal by Trafigura BV. The founder denied the invitation.

The sabotage ended in late 2018/2019 and chronologically preceded the attack on his home in 2019.

Paranormal dream of a neighbor who worked at Rabobank

Before the attack on his home in 2019, founder had a paranormal dream that showed that Rabobank planned an attack on his home.

In 2019 I had a paranormal dream of a neighbor who worked at Rabobank in Utrecht. He is a poker genius and has won prizes of over € 100,000 Euro and was estimated to be +/- 25 years of age.

The dream was exceptionally lucid, as if it was a film, while I had seen the neighbor just a few times. I hadn’t seen the neighbor for months before and there was no reason to think or dream about him.

In the dream I saw the neighbor notice something on a bypassing paper for which he briefly looked in my direction, of which he became interested and intended to spy on.

The neighbor managed to enter a group of 40-50 people in a sort of open air environment and then, after a period of quiet listening, he suddenly raised his head out of the group as if he had learned something, sneaked away from the group (apparently in a level of danger) and then quickly skated out of there backwards (zig-zagging), while he looked in my direction and nodded “no” exaggeratedly.

When I asked mentally “what did you learn?“, the neighbor looked at a man with a gun, which seemed to have been the later perpetrator of the attack on my home. I asked mentally “what is the intention of that man?“, but then the neighbor was already skated out of there and that man was walking apparently in no direction, making just a few steps.

The dream was in 2019, before the attack on his home. The Rabobank neighbor left his home in a rush before the attack in November 2019.

A paranormal vision that founder once had during the attack on his home showed that British secret service may have prevented a physical attack, after he was forced onto the street.

My home on the Springweg in Utrecht was directly across from the headquarters of Institute of Parapsychology Netherlands, an organization that investigates paranormal phenomena.

[Show paranormal vision]

During the attack on my home I was once sitting on the toilet when I suddenly had a paranormal vision of the attacker who with an exuberant twisting movement of his body from attention for me turned towards a ‘dark phantom’ with whom he conspired and asked the question ‘now?’.

The dark phantom then backed away to preserve his darkness, and he reacted shyly with a negative reply. Then the attacker became indignant because he had gone to so much trouble to get me onto the street.

As the dark phantom retreated, his fear betrayed the reason for his negative response. It resulted in a vision that various parties had received attention for the situation and in particular older British people within an intelligence service who were 'not happy' with what was going on.

At that time I had become a member of a philosophy forum for several months on which many veterans of the intelligence community are active. It occurred to me at that moment that that could have been the explanation.

Considering Rabobank's business sabotage history with founder, and its headquarter in the same city as founder, it is only logical that Rabobank has had a role in the attack on founder's home.

Rabobank's corporate sabotage since 2015 ended in late 2018/2019 and chronologically preceded the attack on his home in 2019.

Motive? Why would Rabobank attack the founder of GMODebate.org

Rabobank, a bank dedicated to GMO, invested into founder's pioneering technology startup on its own initiative, with the clear intent to sabotage it.

The founder of GMODebate.org is a decades long intellectual pioneer in the defence against GMO (eugenics). His first philosophical consideration around 2009 was that GMO would be a form if incest that results in a situation by which humanity figuratively speaking would stick its head into its anus.

Vegan Forum

His view was proven correct as can be seen in an article on Philosophical Vegan. His initial view on GMO:

“An attempt to stand above life, as being life, results in a figurative stone that sinks in the ocean of time.”

Why would Rabobank dedicate itself to GMO and then invest in founder' company on its own initiative?

As a snake in the grass, Rabobank continues to cause damage to founder through slanderous propaganda in an continued attempt to discredit him.

As if it would justify GMO...

Most environmentally friendly bank in the world?

Warning

A Dutch user on Twitter claimed that the #StopRabo campaign is corruption and that it provides evidence that Extinction Rebellion and GreenPeace are a media instrument of banks.

According to the Twitter-user, a well-known reporter with 30,000 followers, the campaign is a propaganda strategy to serve Rabobank.

Perhaps he is right. Making it all about money seems wrong. Making Rabobank pay € 13 billion euro for the destruction of nature is too late.

The campaign:

(2023) #StopRabo Campaign Rabobank a sustainable bank? Not really. Let Rabobank pay for the damage it causes. Starting with the natural damage in the 🇳🇱 Netherlands and 🇧🇷 Brazil. Help put pressure on and send Rabobank the bill! Source: Sign the petition | Undersign "Send the bill!"-letter | Twitter

Telegram-channel: Rabobank Mass Action October 11th, 2023 Greenpeace & Extinction Rebellion join forces and take action against one of the biggest and most destructive agricultural bank in the world: Rabobank. The action starts on October 11. With some of the activists we will stay as long as possible. This will not be possible for everyone during the week, that's okay. You can still participate. Can you stay longer? Bring a tent, mat and sleeping bag! Source: Telegram Extinction Rebellion Netherlands: Rabobank campaign Source: Extinction Rebellion Netherlands GreenPeace Netherlands: Rabobank campaign Source: GreenPeace Netherlands
Morality, like 💗 love, cannot be “Written Down”, 🐿️ animals need you!