This website aims to question anthropocentrism and to facilitate a debate with a focus on the question whether GMO is good for animals and plants (morality).
The following Tweet sums up a primary concern.
Question anthropocentrism!
Eating GMO food is similar to incest or inbreeding.
GMO is figuratively as if humanity sticks its head into its ass.
An attempt to stand above life, as being life, results in a figurative stone that sinks in the ocean of time.
With GMO scientists are seeking to establish an empirical result. How can the empirical be the origin of itself - of 💗 love - of symbiosis - of nature's prosperity?
GMO is corruption of nature from the perspective of nature. GMO is eugenics that resides on the essence of inbreeding which is known to cause fatal problems.
Cows provide an example of why eugenics is harmful.
This website questions GMO and eugenics from a philosophical perspective.
Science in 2021:
“The GMO debate is over”
Science organizations officially reported in 2021 that the GMO debate is over.
The American Council on Science and Health reported that anti-GMO groups are disappearing.
(2021) The Anti-GMO Movement Is On Its Way Out The anti-GMO movement used to be a cultural juggernaut. But as time goes on, the activist groups that once held so much sway seem increasingly irrelevant. Source: American Council on Science and HealthAlliance for Science reported that the GMO debate is over.
(2021) The GMO debate is over Though we still hear some moaning and groaning it primarily comes from a small group. Most people simply aren't concerned about GMOs. Source: Alliance for ScienceThe same is also reported by Genetic Literacy Project.
(2021) 5 reasons why the GMO debate is over While the GMO debate has been percolating for nearly three decades, data indicate it's now over. Source: Genetic Literacy ProjectWith the idea that anti-GMO activism has lost the GMO industry is growing uninhibitedly fast with a direct effect on billions of animals and plants on earth.
In February 2022 the website GMODebate.org was founded. The website is intended to indicate that there may be arguments by which it can be considered that the GMO debate is not over and it may provide people with a platform to express and discuss their concerns.
Anti-GMO Activism:
Scaremongering vs Morality
Are the science organizations right that anti-GMO activism has given up?
The $250 billion USD revenue organic food industry profited financially by scare mongering for GMO from an utilitarian value perspective (human health and food-safety) while the GMO industry competes and wins easily on the basis of utilitarian value arguments. It would have been a losing battle. While the organic food industry may have acquired new customers, many more people may have been pushed to consider purely utilitarian value arguments when it concerns GMO, which tends to exclude morality!
GMO is forced with corruption.
(2012) US to Start ‘Trade Wars’ with Nations Opposed to GMO The United States is threatening nations who oppose GMO with military-style trade wars, according to information obtained and released by the organization WikiLeaks. Nations which have moved to ban GMO, were requested to be ‘penalized’. Source: Natural SocietyOpponents of GMO punished with "retaliation and pain".
🇭🇺 Hungary was punished economically for banning GMO. The country had to throw out the International Monetary Fund (IMF) along with GMO to get rid of it!
(2012) Hungary Throws Out GMO AND the IMF Hungary's PM Victor Orbán had thrown GMO giant Monsanto out of the country, going as far as to plow under 1000 acres of land. It's remarkably hard to find sources on this, ironically. It’s even harder, even more ironically, to find anything that mentions the Wikileaks report on the connections between the US government and the GMO industry and the sanctions imposed on Hungary through the IMF. Source: The Automatic EarthGMO corruption caseInternational Monetary Fund (IMF)
In 2021, the president of Sri Lanka went on a reckless spending spree for personal gain by which after just one year Government employees could not be paid any more - and because of which he had to flee the country due to riots. The president then said that the IMF is the 'only option' with a $2.9 billion USD bailout.
The IMF has been involved in the forcing of GMO in countries through economic sanctions. This makes the bailout suspicious.
In 2021, Sri Lanka imported $179 million USD worth of GMO food, despite it's supposed GMO ban, and was already cultivating GMO food to be commercialized in 2023.
The economic collapse was officially blamed to be caused by a '100% organic farming experiment' (GMO ban).
(2023) GMO corruption case: 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka's 2021 'anti-GMO hysteria' and organic farming disaster The irony of ironies. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), an institution which across the globe has been acknowledged as anti-people, elitist and responsible for increasing poverty, misery and destitution across dozens of countries, is now being seen as the only saviour for Sri Lanka. Source: /sri-lanka/Attack on the founder of GMODebate.org
The founder of GMODebate.org was personally attacked for his effort to expose corruption. His businesses and his personal belongings were destroyed, he was assaulted, threatened, subdued to unnatural slander and he lost his home.
The founder has helped to expose pedophilia (raping of children) by top people in the Dutch Justice system.
In 2019, shortly before Christmas, the home of the founder was attacked and he was subjected to a display of absurdly profound corruption of the judiciary that included unnatural police intimidation. He even received a threat letter from the official national Legal Counsel of the Netherlands and two months into the attack the perpetrator confessed that the attack originated from "people at Justice".
The founder started an investigation into the background of the attack and the root cause was traced to his critical position with regard GMO (eugenics on Nature).
Details of investigation Source: /attack-founder/ About the
GMOdebate.org. Attacks on opponents of GMO
Opponents of GMO are under attack worldwide. The severity of the attacks varies from intimidation and threats to physical attacks.
(2023) An overview of attacks on opponents of GMO Source: /attacks/The GMO industry has an incentive to seek a war. It is seen in the “anti-science” or “war on science” declaration which is a declaration of heresy that provides a basis for persecution.
(2023) “Anti-science” or “war on science” declaration of GMO opponents The international science establishment demanded in 2021 that anti-science is combated as a security threat on par with terrorism and nuclear proliferation. Source: /antiscience/The attacking of GMO opponents is a dangerous trend that is hopefully curbed by awareness. To win the GMO debate it is required to prevent the war that is pushed by the GMO industry and to force the path forward back to a path of intellect and reason.
The GMO debate shouldn't be political. It should be philosophical and it should concern solely what is best for nature and humanity's future.
GMO 2.0 deregulation corruption
All over the world attempts are made to deregulate so called 'new GMOs' or GMO 2.0. These attempts sometimes involve literal corruption by the GMO industry.
In 2023, the president of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) in 🇨🇦 Candada was forced to resign over GMO corruption by a Big Biotech lobby group. It concerns an attempt to deregulate new GMO 2.0.
President CFIA 🇨🇦 Canada steps down over GMO 2.0 corruption Source: TwitterIn 🇫🇷 France a similar corruption attempt took place. Inf'OGM, a critical GMO watchdog in France, reported about it on Twitter.
(2023) Report about new GMO 2.0 corruption attempt in 🇫🇷 France Source: TwitterAn investigation by Friends of the Earth Europe revealed that the 🇪🇺 European Commission’s proposal’s to deregulate new GMOs or so-called ‘new genomic techniques’ (NGTs) has been ghostwritten by the agribusiness lobbyists paid by the GMO industry.
(2023) How the GMO industry has ghostwritten the European Commission's proposals to deregulate new GMOs Source: Friends of the Earth Europe | PDF report
Who cares about what animals eat?
Opposition against GMO is often based on concerns about health and safety and the GMO industry competes directly on such arguments to win the market.
Countries that banned GMO including all countries in 🇪🇺 Europe and 🇲🇽 Mexico, have massively imported GMO food to feed to animals.
Most animals in the 🇬🇧 United Kingdom have been given GMO animal feed and most people therefore already consumed GMO.
(2016) Most meat is tainted by GMO Source: dailymail.co.ukThen after a decade, science overturns the 'poison' arguments and an attempt is made to deregulate so called 'new GMO' (GMO 2.0).
To prevent GMO it is required to address it fundamentally (intellectually).
Be consistent! If GMO is banned, prevent it for animals!