US War in 🇱🇾 Libya
Investigation of corruption
NATO was present in a secret spy operation in Oslo since 18 months before the terror attack in 2011 and the Minister of Justice of Norway later said that 'he didn't knew'.
After the terror attack the Prime Minister of Norway became the head of NATO (highest function).
The office of the Prime Minister was specifically targeted and blew up.(2011) Deadly blast rocks prime minister's office in Oslo Source: france24.com
Norway had rejected the 2011 NATO bombing coalition against Libya, which the Netherlands had already done shortly before, and was independently leading peace talks that could have dragged several countries into anti-war policy.(2021) The secret Norwegian peace talks that nearly prevented Libya’s 2011 war The confidential Norwegian-brokered peace talks were the closest in the world to come to a peaceful end to Libya’s 2011 war. Source: independent.co.uk
After the terror attack Norway dropped the most bombs of all countries (600 in total according to Wikipedia) which is illogical. The bombs killed more than 500.000 innocent people in Libya!
(2021) NATO Killed Civilians in Libya. It's Time to Admit It. Source: Twitter | foreignpolicy.com (Foreign Policy)
Many questions about the terror attack are unanswered.
- Eye witnesses testified that there were multiple shooters. They also clearly describe the person that they had seen.
- Just 48 hours before the bombing in Oslo, police units were engaged in terrorist bombing exercises near what would later be 'ground zero.'. Special elite police unit concluded training for near identical scenario just minutes before the bomb attack.
Detailed information is available in the following publication:
During the Cold War, NATO carried out terrorist attacks in European cities under the name Operation Gladio, for which left-wing groups were falsely blamed. The attacks were intended to create an atmosphere of fear.
September 11 terrorist attack and the 9/11 Truth movement
A US politician (very beautiful in appearance) replied the following to questions by founder:
In the case that the Government has performed the 9/11 attack, what would (or should) it imply?
Politician: I think it implies that our government IS a terrorist organization. While, we are mere citizens; we should not condone or support its more murderous activities. Although, I think the guns are now being pointed at us.“Questions to a US politician about the 9/11 attack” Source: onlinephilosophyclub.com
While it is possible to claim that the 9/11 Truth movement is based on a conspiracy theory. The mere existence and serious dedication of organizations such as "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" or "Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth" and the fact that an official US politician claims that the Government 'IS' (capitalized) a terrorist organization - and communicates that openly towards the public as a means to demand change for "a policy which tortures, kills, and terrorizes people." might be taken as an indication that the idea that the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 was performed by the Government, should be taken serious.
There are many serious organizations that question the 9/11 attack.
- 9/11 Truth
- Scientists for Truth
- Firemen for Truth
- Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
- Scholars for Truth
- Justice for 9/11
- Pilots for 9/11 Truth
- Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
- Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth And Justice
- Physics 9/11
- Many dozens more...
The founder of GMOdebate.org was not acting alone...
As can be seen on the website Christchurch Truth, the 2019 New Zealand terrorist attack is called a PsyOp.
The founder has completed the investigation to the best of his abilities. He has reported about it with sincerity through the website PsyReporter.com.
The founder is absolutely not inclined to investigate violent conflicts or social injustice. He prefers to be neutral and to stay away from politics or ideology. The founder is primarily interested in fundamental philosophy and morality and isn't interested in debate about opinion.
Why then did the founder get to address corruption related to the US war in Libya?
A few months before the attack on the home of the founder in 2019 Google started to show a remarkable ad on his phone for a tiny local newspaper of a far away town that he is in no way affiliated with, which reminded him of political corruption that he had reported about almost a decade earlier.Political extortion and euthanasia in psychiatry ('the Dutch Way') Source: onlinephilosophyclub.com
In retro-perspective, the articles about 🇮🇳 Air India 113 and the lying by India's ministry about the MH17 airplane attack were the first thing that the founder saw in Google's top 10 search results causing him to post them on his Facebook profile just a few days after the attack. It is strange that ultimately even two years after the attack literally zero media in the Netherlands and other Western countries had provided attention to Air India 113.
As can be considered evident, the founder simply fulfilled his duty as a regular human being, strengthened solely on the basis of his theoretical capacity to act.